Word From KMW: Earlier than we get began as we speak, I simply needed to let you understand that this weekend, I’m excited to be sharing a presentation on the WorldShift: The Speculative Fiction Writers’ Summit 2025. This can be a free, 4-day on-line occasion filled with workshops on character, worldbuilding, plotting, publishing, and extra from 30+ writing specialists. Whether or not you write speculative fiction or not, you’ll stroll away with instruments you need to use in any story. You possibly can seize your free ticket right here: Be part of the Summit.

***

In fiction, each conflict between characters comes all the way down to a battle administration type. That is true whether or not you’re writing a heated argument or a quiet standoff. In actual life, psychologists group these into 5 principal approaches: competing, collaborating, compromising, accommodating, and avoiding. Understanding how every works will help you write richer, extra sensible character conflicts.

It’s a widespread axiom within the writing world that battle drives story. Though the simplicity of this recommendation is essentially restricted, what it means is that plot is created from a sequence catalysts that trigger characters to reply. Principally: trigger and impact.

That is what then creates the chain of story occasions (aka, scenes) that engenders the bigger story. At its easiest, story battle is nothing kind of than some form of impediment interfering with a personality’s ahead development. That mentioned, the phrase “battle” itself does are inclined to most readily connote interpersonal battle—whether or not within the type of a fistfight or a passive-aggressive argument. Certainly, most individuals discover this facet of battle to be essentially the most clearly entertaining and helpful for plot, because it tends to inherently mix all three of a narrative’s main engines: plot, theme, and character.

Which means a lot of what writers have to learn about battle basically comes all the way down to character conflicts. The extra nuanced your characterizations, the extra attention-grabbing the battle might be and the extra sensible and compelling your characters might be.

So how do you create nuanced character battle?

A technique is to review and perceive battle administration types. In the event you can determine which battle administration types greatest suit your characters, you not solely have the chance to create instantaneously complicated relationship dynamics (since each character’s strategy to battle might be completely different), but in addition battle that naturally arises from the administration types themselves (e.g., characters with opposing types can typically spark battle simply because they conflict with one another’s approaches).

In This Article:

Take the Check: What Are the 5 Battle Administration Types?

The concept of 5 distinct battle administration types comes from the Thomas-Kilmann Battle Mode Instrument (TKI), developed within the early Seventies by psychologists Kenneth W. Thomas and Ralph H. Kilmann. Initially designed for office and organizational settings, the mannequin maps how folks deal with battle alongside two dimensions: how an individual pursues one’s personal objectives (i.e., a spectrum of unassertiveness and assertiveness) and the way one considers others’ objectives (i.e., a spectrum of uncooperativeness to cooperativeness). From there, they used these two axes to map 5 core approaches to battle: competing, collaborating, compromising, accommodating, and avoiding.

To find which type most closely fits your characters (and your self!), you’ll be able to buy the official take a look at right here. Under is a brief model that may get you began by providing you with the overall concept:

Character Battle Fashion Quiz

Uncover how your characters naturally deal with disagreements, pressure, and energy struggles. Begin by selecting a single character you wish to assess. For every assertion under, think about how this character would reply in a wide range of conditions (e.g., with mates, rivals, strangers, and so forth.).

Fee every assertion on a scale of 1–5:

1 = Strongly Disagree

2 = Disagree

3 = Impartial / Typically True

4 = Agree

5 = Strongly Agree

On the finish, observe the scoring information to find your character’s dominant battle type(s).

The Statements

1. My character pushes laborious for his/her personal approach, even when it dangers upsetting others.
2. My character seeks options that work for everybody concerned within the disagreement.
3. My character will quit a part of what he/she desires if it helps resolve the battle.
4. My character typically lets others have their technique to preserve the peace.
5. My character avoids mentioning points except there’s no different alternative.
6. My character enjoys discovering artistic options by which everybody feels happy.
7. My character is keen to settle midway if it ends the argument rapidly.
8. My character places the opposite particular person’s wants first when concord issues most.
9. My character adjustments the topic or withdraws to keep away from escalation.
10. My character insists on his/her personal place, believing he/she’s proper.

Scoring

Add the scores for every type class:

• Competing = Q1 + Q10
• Collaborating = Q2 + Q6
• Compromising = Q3 + Q7
• Accommodating = This autumn + Q8
• Avoiding = Q5 + Q9

Highest Rating → That is your character’s dominant type in battle.

Shut Second(s) → These could possibly be secondary type(s) your character could use in sure conditions.

Lowest Rating(s) → These are the types your character is least seemingly to make use of.

Use the dominant type to form your characters’ dialogue, physique language, and selections in tense scenes. From there, you’ll be able to play along with your story’s battle by placing your characters in conditions that power them into their weakest types. Not solely does this normally create extra battle, nevertheless it’s nice for progress arcs and plot twists. Additionally, search for methods to mix completely different types in ensemble casts to create pure friction between characters.

Understanding battle administration types to your characters can present a strong basis that influences many features of your story. This lays the groundwork for sensible personalities, whereas additionally contributing to the way you handle every scene’s pressure, pacing, and tone. It should affect how character relationships play out, and—since that is normally the guts of any story—from there it may find yourself creating the plot all by itself.

In the event you notice anyone character lacks a powerful battle type and/or lots of your characters share the identical type, you’ll be able to simply troubleshoot for a stronger narrative by mixing issues up or strengthening the accuracy and consistency of how a specific battle type is displaying up in your story.

Utilizing the 5 Types Battle Administration Types to Construct Character Battle

Let’s take a deeper take a look at every of the 5 types and the way every one would possibly present up in your fiction.

1. The Competing Fashion: Excessive-Stakes Showdowns

Characters with a Competing type go all in to get what they need. They rating excessive in each assertiveness and uncooperativeness, which implies they have a tendency to prioritize victory over relationships. This may be an effective way to lift the stakes, because it creates eventualities with clear winners and losers.

Though these characters typically come throughout as egocentric, they may also be glorious leaders since they’re in the end all about effectivity. Their focus is completely on getting outcomes, which may truly be on behalf of another person (i.e., defending or offering for the group) even when relationships are sometimes not components within the resolution making.

For Instance:

• Miranda Priestly in The Satan Wears Prada relentlessly pushes her personal agendas, no matter the way it impacts others. When she calls for Andrea acquire an unpublished Harry Potter manuscript for her twins, Miranda exerts whole management, making it clear her wants come earlier than anybody else’s.

• Captain Ahab in Moby-Dick obsessively pursues his personal objective (killing the whale), even at the price of his crew’s security. He rallies the crew to affix his hunt for Moby-Dick, overriding the ship’s unique mission and dismissing the primary mate Starbuck’s considerations.

2. The Collaborating Fashion: Win-Win Options

When two characters workforce as much as discover a answer that works for everybody, they’re Collaborating. Not like the Competing type, the Collaborating type can typically serve to strengthen connections even whereas highlighting variations. Like Opponents, Collaborators rating excessive in assertiveness. They’re there to get the job executed, however as a result of additionally they rating excessive in cooperativeness, they need to take action in a approach that doesn’t clearly outline themselves as winners and everybody else as losers.

These characters make nice leaders, though normally extra heart-based than the head-based Opponents. Typically their downfall could be attempting to make conditions work for everybody when that isn’t doable or fascinating (which may mockingly trigger everybody to “lose”).

For Instance:

• As she turns into a frontrunner, Moana works to seek out options that honor her folks’s traditions whereas additionally fixing their pressing wants. When she realizes the antagonist is definitely the goddess Te Fiti, Moana doesn’t search to defeat her, however moderately restores her coronary heart, resolving the battle in a approach that advantages everybody.

• Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird strives to hunt reality and equity by balancing empathy with justice and involving others within the ethical dialog. Throughout his courtroom protection of Tom Robinson, he appeals to the jury’s conscience and shared values in an try to achieve a decision that serves each justice and his group’s ethical integrity.

3. The Compromising Fashion: Assembly within the Center

This type wishes either side to provide a little bit and meet within the center. Compromisers are inclined to create a partial decision that also leaves some pressure in play. Compromisers experience the center of each axes—assertiveness and cooperation—touchdown someplace betwixt and between. As a result of they lack as a lot assertiveness as Opponents and Collaborators, they have a tendency to fill management roles solely reluctantly and within the absence of somebody extra decisive. This isn’t essentially as a result of the extra decisive varieties are higher leaders, however as a result of these varieties can typically fill the position sooner, whereas the Compromising kind continues to be inspecting all of the choices.

The Compromising type can typically lend itself to indecision. As a result of their biggest need is for everybody to be joyful, they’ll get caught in pursuit of an not possible splendid. They are often irritating to each assertive varieties, however supply useful and obligatory views.

For Instance:

• Marty McFly in Again to the Future constantly seeks middle-ground options to keep away from outright confrontation, like persuading George to face as much as Biff so he doesn’t need to straight battle Biff himself, or discovering a technique to get the time machine operating with out demanding perfection from Doc.

• Katniss Everdeen in The Starvation Video games typically negotiates partial agreements with allies (like Peeta or Haymitch) to outlive, whereas nonetheless holding to her values. Though she’s going to battle if pushed (indicating a secondary battle type), she usually prefers to seek out workaround options.

4. The Accommodating Fashion: In search of Peace

Typically a personality will give in to maintain the peace, a alternative that may alternatively reveal loyalty, concern, or quiet acts of self-sacrifice. This battle type scores low in assertiveness and excessive in cooperativeness. Though this type typically lends itself to characters who can get run over by extra assertive varieties, it additionally represents essentially the most empathetic of the 5. That is normally an individual who is extremely tuned in to others.

Nonetheless, their battle aversion could make it tough for them to get what they need or to pursue (or typically even acknowledge) their very own wishes. In the event that they don’t have a powerful secondary type to assist them out, they’ll (mockingly) wrestle to create sufficient battle to drive the plot.

For Instance:

• Samwise Gamgee in The Lord of the Rings reveals Accommodating tendencies in his dedication to placing Frodo’s wants and security above his personal wishes, even when it’s laborious, comparable to on Mt. Doom when he provides Frodo the final of their water as a substitute of taking it himself, prioritizing Frodo’s wants over his personal survival. Nonetheless, Sam additionally reveals a powerful secondary Aggressive type, particularly when confronting Gollum.

• Beth March in Little Ladies constantly yields to her sisters’ needs with the intention to preserve household concord, even at private value. As an illustration, when Meg is invited to a celebration, Beth encourages her to go despite the fact that it means Beth will left be alone.

5. The Avoiding Fashion: Delaying the Battle

Lastly, as a substitute of going through the problem, a personality would possibly dodge the battle completely. Though this may completely deflate a scene’s battle, it may additionally lend itself to subtextual passive-aggression as the strain builds within the silence and unresolved feelings linger. Notably, though this kind scores low in assertiveness, it scores excessive in uncooperativeness.

This type typically lends itself to loner characters preferring to go their very own approach moderately than have interaction with others. It’s separate from the Accommodating type in that it’s extra involved with defending itself than placating others. The true Avoidant type can even do nearly something to keep away from battle. It could moderately slip away (both bodily or by disassociation) than bond or battle with the intention to finish the dispute.

For Instance:

• Christopher McCandless in Into the Wild constantly sidesteps the deep battle of his strained household relationships, as a substitute bodily eradicating himself by leaving house and embarking on a solo journey into the wilderness. His avoidance defines not simply remoted moments, however his total lifestyle’s tensions.

• Bruce Banner in The Avengers retains a low profile in Calcutta, tending to sufferers and dodging any state of affairs that may set off his transformation. His alter-ego, the Hulk, after all, shows the other battle type of Competitor.

Ideas for Mixing Battle Types in Your Story

Though most characters will exhibit a main battle type, this doesn’t imply they’ll’t make the most of secondary techniques as properly. Normally, secondary techniques will signify a much less well-developed (and subsequently much less “mature”) strategy that kicks in when the first type proves counter-productive.

You need to use battle types as a central fulcrum in creating a personality arc. For instance, a personality who depends completely on a Competing type may need to discover ways to grow to be much less aggressive and extra Cooperative. Likewise, as in Into the Wild, your story might give attention to the hazards of taking anyone battle type to a tragic excessive.

One of many single greatest methods to make the most of battle types in your story is to give attention to the interaction between how the types present up in several characters.

For Instance:

• Two Accomodating characters will in all probability cancel one another out, making a scene that lacks battle (and possibly no one getting what they need both).
• Two Aggressive characters might be entertaining, however except one among them arcs in any other case, their story will at all times finish with clear winners and losers.
• Aggressive and Collaborative leaders can create attention-grabbing tales that begin with sparks and finish with mutual progress.
• Compromising characters can typically wrestle in confronting different varieties, however supply each balanced views and room for progress.

With deep roots in psychology, battle administration types make for highly effective storytelling instruments. By giving every character a transparent, constant strategy to battle, you’ll be able to create genuine pressure, pure relationship dynamics, and plot turns that really feel inevitable. It’s possible you’ll wish to see your characters locking horns in a showdown or discovering artistic win-win options or slipping quietly out the again door. Regardless of the case, the best way they deal with battle will form all the things from pacing to theme. Mastering these 5 types will help you write tales that really feel extra actual, extra layered, and much more compelling.

In Abstract

The 5 battle administration types—Competing, Collaborating, Compromising, Accommodating, and Avoiding—supply writers a structured technique to design plausible interpersonal battle. Every type is outlined by how characters steadiness assertiveness (pursuing their very own objectives) and cooperativeness (contemplating others’ objectives). Assigning battle types to characters provides depth, realism, and pressure to your scenes and relationships. Going additional, to combine completely different types in your forged can then naturally generate friction and plot momentum. You possibly can even shift a personality’s type over time to create satisfying character arcs.

Key Takeaways

• Battle drives story. Understanding your characters’ battle types makes that battle richer and extra natural.
• Completely different types = completely different sparks. Pairing contrasting types creates built-in pressure, whereas matching types can both cancel battle or amplify it.
• Excessive reliance on one type generally is a flaw that drives an arc or downfall.
• Use the Character Battle Fashion Quiz to rapidly establish how your characters strategy disagreements.
• Incorporating real-world psychology fashions into fiction can enhance authenticity and reader engagement.

Need Extra?

In the event you’d prefer to take your character growth even additional, take a look at my Creating Character Arcs Workbook. Filled with guided workout routines, prompts, and construction templates, it should assist you chart your characters’ journeys from begin to end. It covers Constructive Change Arcs, Flat Arcs, and Unfavorable Change Arcs. Discover ways to weave plot and character collectively seamlessly so each scene feels purposeful and emotionally resonant. It’s out there in e-book and paperback.

Wordplayers, inform me your opinion! Which of your characters has essentially the most clearly outlined battle administration type, and the way has it formed relationships or the plot? Inform me within the feedback!

Click on the “Play” button to Take heed to Audio Model (or subscribe to the Serving to Writers Change into Authors podcast in Apple Podcast, Amazon Music, or Spotify).

___

Love Serving to Writers Change into Authors? Now you can grow to be a patron. (Enormous due to these of you who’re already a part of my Patreon household!)