The tl;dr earlier than you get into this submit is that this: the SFWA got here out, mentioned that some AI utilization was okay sufficient in books for the authors of these books to to not be disqualified from profitable a Nebula award, folks received (accurately) pissed, the SFWA swiftly threw that fish again into the water and was like, “Simply kidding, AI is unhealthy,” after which launched this survey to get group enter on AI utilization in writing and publishing.

Consequently, a couple of people have kinda popped up their heads to be like, “However is all AI unhealthy?” and a few of that is cheap and needed dialogue, as a result of positive, what in case your phrase processor by chance injects some form of AI course of into the work, or what in case your writer in opposition to your needs makes use of AI in, say, the advertising of the guide? What does that imply for you? Do you’ve got recourse? Are you continue to in a position to win awards? I assume it might suck to be shut out of awards for that — although, on the similar time, awards aren’t even the frosting on high of the cake however the sprinkles on high of the frosting? No matter.

In fact, in typical trend, normally these form of cheap questions are a Computer virus to permit numerous different exceptions in by means of the town gates. To proceed to combine metaphors, in case you give a mouse an AI cookie, properly, he’s gonna need the AI milk, the AI straw, till ultimately you’ve given him an AI nuclear bomb the place he kills all of the human beings and might feast on our smoldering corpses at his rodenty leisure.

One of many individuals who popped up was Erin Underwood, who wrote an open letter about all this. It’s a letter that purports to be cheap, widespread sense, however in my thoughts is a goalpost-shifting mouse-cookie-giving very hungry caterpillar of a submit, the place it simply desires an increasing number of — and so, it summons in me the urge to level out plenty of its flaws. And this, on my half, might be already a sucker transfer, as a result of Underwood kind of means that AI has written her open letter, a minimum of partly:

“For transparency, I used speech-to-text to seize my phrases and generative AI to wash up grammar and construction. I wanted an environment friendly option to get my ideas down rapidly so I might transfer into the work of manually enhancing and refining this textual content. I went by means of it a number of instances, revising language, examples, and arguments till the ultimate model totally matched my imaginative and prescient. This was carried out deliberately to display how AI can perform as a communication device for enterprise functions. This letter isn’t a murals or creative creation.”

So already, we’re off on a damaged foot. I’ve no concept how a lot of a human letter I’m responding to. (And for full transparency on my half — all of this submit is 100% human-written, human-edited, human-derived. I’m not Soylent Greening this shit. That is all me, flaws and all.)

Earlier than I get into her bullet factors, up entrance she is actually saying that we are able to’t be hostile to the dialog, to those tough questions, and that:

On the similar time, refusing to adapt in ways in which defend our personal communities would create new hurt. Writers, artists, musicians, publishers, and the industries that assist them should stay viable and aggressive in a contemporary world that’s changing into deeply depending on AI instruments and AI-driven infrastructure. If we’re going to defend the way forward for inventive work, we want award guidelines which are sensible and that additionally enable us to make use of extraordinary enterprise instruments.

My first thought right here is: yeah, no, that’s not likely true.

There’s little proof at hand, at the start, that AI is a value-add to any of this. Writing, making music, publishing, no matter. Industries not utilizing them are completely viable. Writers not utilizing AI stay completely viable. (I’d argue: greater than viable! Truly, you’re higher not utilizing it! AI is routinely proven to lower effectivity and require extra human intervention, typically simply at reduce price.) The trick to this paragraph is it’s a false attraction to purpose: a quietly fear-based method that you simply don’t wish to (gasp) be left behind since you aren’t utilizing the cheap enterprise instruments. Besides, once more, nothing about that is cheap. AI is a random middle-man created by shitty techlords, compelled into programs in order that they receives a commission and that the Magic Quantity Traces go up as a substitute of flatten or descend.

We’re solely as “dependent” on AI instruments and infrastructure as we select to be — this isn’t an computerized. However therein lies one of many tricksy bits about this letter, like so lots of the AI boosters: it presupposes an automagic AI future, a future for AI in and above us. It assumes it’s already right here to remain, already embedded in us like a tick, so we’d as properly make pals with the parasite and use its Lyme Illness Instruments and its Rocky Mountain Noticed Infrastructure. Why treatment it? It’s already in us! No purpose to ask who will rid us of this meddlesome an infection!

Having a sure/no swap that governs the usage of AI and generative AI isn’t viable as a result of this know-how is now embedded all through the core infrastructure that helps companies immediately. Nonetheless, the basically human act of creation should stay in human fingers. On the similar time, there are AI use instances that contact inventive work instantly and not directly, typically with out the creator’s data or consent. These realities should be acknowledged. Creators shouldn’t be penalized for incidental, unintentional, or third-party use of AI in enterprise processes surrounding their unique work.

That is in all probability one of many solely cheap bits within the letter. Sure, there are robust realities of gen-AI intrusion, partly as a result of so many tech providers are foisting it upon us — and we aren’t all the time conscious of how deeply that splinter is caught.

However, once more, give a mouse a cookie…

The inventive arts group is experiencing a deep sense of disruption and vulnerability in response to the fast rise of generative AI. These considerations are respectable and, for a lot of, unsettling. When tech corporations started creating massive language fashions, unique inventive works have been used with out permission to coach the very programs that are actually threatening creators’ livelihoods, authorship, and possession. That breach of belief is actual and unresolved. It can also’t be undone, which implies creatives and the industries that assist them should assume strategically about how this know-how shapes each threat and alternative going ahead whereas additionally persevering with to battle for honest compensation for his or her work (which, once more, was used with out permission).

Ahh. Begins cheap, however ends with: “It can also’t be undone.” Look, sorry, the demon is out! We are able to’t include the demon, so now we simply gotta determine how you can dwell with the demon — positive, we are able to feed it, however we even have to verify it isn’t consuming us! In any other case, it’s effective!

Besides, it’s not effective. It did steal from us, and that’s not simply past-tense shit. It’s now and can proceed to take action.

AI isn’t inevitable.

Say it once more:

AI isn’t inevitable.

AI IS NOT INEVITABLE.

The one technique right here is the sum whole pushback in opposition to its uncanny horrors and its non-consensual intrusion into each nook of our world — it steals our content material, guzzles our water, will increase our energy payments, is crammed into providers we didn’t ask for it to be crammed into whereas additionally charging us extra money for the “privelege.” There is no such thing as a technique right here besides to search out the fields the place the AI grows and metaphorically set them aflame.

And disgrace and anger in opposition to company overreach is a robust fireplace.

The evolution of AI use instances is basically reshaping how trendy enterprise and trade function, from guide publishers to gross sales and advertising corporations, retailers, and fan communities. AI isn’t area of interest any longer. It’s in every single place, together with in our on a regular basis digital instruments and the infrastructure that makes enterprise function successfully. It shapes advertising and promoting, powers web browsers and discovery programs, feeds social media platforms, and helps strategic planning, workflow design, inside communications, and day-to-day operations.

Price seeing the conflation right here — generative AI and LLMs should not the identical AI that essentially powers each different factor.

Publishers can’t realistically keep away from utilizing these instruments in the event that they intend to stay aggressive and proceed promoting books, artwork, and music created by their authors and artists. On the similar time, these instruments are enabling smaller and impartial publishers to compete extra successfully with massive corporations similar to Tor, Penguin Random Home, and Gollancz by bettering effectivity, attain, and sustainability.

Publishers can and should keep away from utilizing generative AI and LLM AI. Publishers stay aggressive by hiring and coaching actual folks to do actual folks jobs that assist actual folks authors and actual folks readers. AI stays a damaged foot. Unhealthy for the surroundings, unhealthy for writers, and likewise, typically doesn’t work properly — it definitely doesn’t work as properly, or as creatively, as precise people! Bear in mind, the AI is fed with the work of precise people. Why do you assume that’s, precisely?

In case you use it, it means you’re changing folks.

Individuals who might’ve carried out the job higher.

Individuals who truly did the job, and now their work is pilfered and duped.

And simply to remind folks now — in case you actually do imagine that AI is simply so nice at what it does, please go discuss to my cat, Boomba. Or is it Franken?

Most creators should not making an attempt to switch their very own inventive labor with AI. They’re appearing in good religion and wish clear, moral boundaries round authorship, originality, and artistic possession. The true problem is that avoiding AI solely is changing into more and more impractical, even for individuals who are dedicated to producing totally human-authored work, as AI is now embedded in programs creators can’t management or realistically keep away from.

Avoiding AI is simple. I do it on a regular basis! Actually, on a regular basis.

Let’s get into what Erin sees as use instances — although you’ll word all through these use instances are theoretical and have zero examples of the place they’ve been used efficiently.

Voice-to-Textual content Dictation: Voice-to-text is among the most typical and accessible digital instruments in use immediately, and most trendy programs depend on generative AI to transcribe, normalize, and proper spoken language. Dictation is used for verbally jotting down concepts, sending textual content messages, and drafting emails.

I assume? To be honest, dictation has… been round for a lot of a few years and predates generative AI. AI has not been important on this — which in fact is the operating theme of AI, far as I can see. “Did you need this factor you do to be higher? No? Too unhealthy, right here’s AI! Additionally, P.S. now it’s truly form of worse.”

(There’s an incredible Marc Maron bit about turmeric. Watch it and change “turmeric” with “generative AI” and also you’ll see what I’m seeing.)

Assembly Transcription: Conferences typically occur over Zoom, Groups, or different video platforms that enable for assembly transcripts, which may additionally generate summaries and lists. These transcripts will also be dropped right into a generative AI system to tug out to do lists, concepts, and themes from the decision.

Once more, I assume, although assembly dictation additionally existed earlier than AI — and also you must also be very, very cautious about letting AI dictate necessary conferences, as a result of do not forget that half the place AI steals stuff? Yeah. That’s a factor. Additionally, keep in mind when it seems ChatGPT is recording all of your conversations with it and other people have been in a position to entry these chats? Riiiiiight. Perhaps don’t do that.

Writing Instruments and Functions: Microsoft Phrase, Gmail, and plenty of different organizational instruments have AI embedded of their code and use applications like Grammarly and CoPilot to assist folks proof, edit, and write. Typically the very phrases you have been going to jot down seem as instructed textual content in case you don’t flip off these features. It’s not simply the creator who’s utilizing these instruments but in addition the editor, the assistants, and any variety of different workers who work on the unique file.

I imply, you’ll be able to normally flip these off — and infrequently it makes for a greater writing expertise as a result of it’s not attempting to auto-suggest boring or incorrect messages, however hey, okay, yeah, this exists. Price noting although that “embedded of their code” is a doubtful sentiment. Additionally, I used to be in a position to downgrade to the model of Phrase with out AI. And I flip it off on my telephone too wherever I discover it. It’s insidious!

Now, for publishers —

AI for Screening and Triage: Some publishers are both contemplating or have already began utilizing AI to a point to handle incoming submissions and to maneuver by means of the digital slush pile to weed out submissions that didn’t observe the rules or different guidelines … in addition to figuring out AI generated writing. This will additionally assist them to search for submissions that meet a selected publishing want rapidly and effectively to raise it for human editorial overview.

Properly, I hate that, and publishers ought to completely not be utilizing AI to weed by means of submissions for a couple of causes:

a) AI is usually fallacious, even at figuring out AI, which is why it’s typically false-flagging issues that college students wrote as “AI” (see, f’rex, folks’s insistence that emdashes imply AI use, regardless that AI received the emdash use from folks)

b) AI is biased, typically invisibly, by those that created it, and you can’t see or modify these biases meaningfully

c) It’s simply gross? Letting a foul, environment-destroying machine do the human job of discovering cool human tales to publish is gross, and fuck you in case you do it

(edit)

And d) it feeds YOUR WORK into THE THIEVING MAGPIE OF AI, what the fuck, you’re simply bloating the beast additional, goddamnit

Preliminary Analysis and Accessibility Instrument: AI may help authors parse complicated scientific ideas, historic materials, or technical topics, translate sources from different languages, or achieve an preliminary understanding of unfamiliar subjects. When used as a place to begin quite than an alternative choice to analysis, this may develop entry to data for authors with out institutional sources.

AI INVENTED A SHITLOAD OF CATS I DON’T OWN

If it does that it undoubtedly can’t clarify high-concept shit reliably.

Please.

Continuity and Reference Instruments: For authors, publishers, and studios managing shared worlds or long-running sequence, personal, domain-specific language fashions can be utilized as inside reference programs to trace character particulars, timelines, world-building information, and continuity. Utilizing AI on this constrained, reference-oriented method helps consistency and accuracy with out producing new inventive content material or changing human authorship.

Okay, you understand what, I’ll concede that there’s some reasonableness right here — I wouldn’t do it, as a result of I’m an individual who likes to have his person-shaped fingers throughout his person-shaped creations. However! Certain, if somebody has a native mannequin AI that they practice on simply their very own materials, hey, go nuts. (Although in case you use it past group and as a substitute use it to, say, create new concepts — properly, you’ve once more offered your self up the river and carried out nothing good in your mind or for the viewers who will sooner or later learn your work.)

Knowledge Analytics, Market Analysis, and Technique: Publishers could use AI to research massive volumes of knowledge to establish catalog gaps, assess dangers, perceive readership traits, optimize launch timing, and inform strategic choices. This instantly impacts publishing decisions for which unique works they settle for and which of them they reject.

Given biases and data-gorging AI, this appears fraught to me — however, once more, perhaps we’re speaking AI within the non-generative sense, and if that’s inspecting uncooked knowledge and doing one thing with that, hey, no matter. Although even right here, I’ll word that essentially the most profitable mannequin of writing and publishing stays the best one: write and publish the very best issues you’ll be able to that talk to your coronary heart and your soul after which work the advertising ropes as greatest as you’ll be able to (with actual cash) to assist the viewers see this factor that you simply made exist.

In the end, I flinch fairly onerous on the concept of letting Skynet determine what unique work ought to exist and what must be rejected, and right here’s why:

One of the best factor you ever learn was an unique concept. It was novel within the truest sense — novel like COVID was novel! Not novel like a novel is novel.

However AI can solely study the previous.

It could possibly solely see the traits that occurred, not the traits that go ahead.

Consider AI like prequel materials — it’s without end sure by what has already come earlier than it and might solely construct upon the bottom that has already been laid. It understands issues that exist, not issues that don’t, and subsequently, in a job primarily based considerably significantly on folks’s creativeness producing unique materials, it’ll shit the mattress. That means, it’ll reject cool new issues as a result of it can’t perceive deviation from the cool previous issues.

(To be honest, corporations fall into this lure with out AI, too! However AI codifies it and removes from the equation human instincts and pursuits.)

AI in Advertising and marketing, Promotion, and Discoverability: Even when a narrative itself is solely human-written, publishers could use AI to generate cowl copy, promotional blurbs, website positioning optimization, CTR evaluation, or advertising insights.

website positioning, okay, no matter, however in case you let AI fuck with my cowl copy, I’ll kick somebody within the dick. Or blurbs! What the shit? Is she suggesting AI write… my blurbs? Those I present as a result of I assumed a guide was cool? At a sure level you simply must surprise what the tip imaginative and prescient is, right here — is it that you simply use AI to generate concepts after which the AI writes a guide off these concepts after which edits it after which an AI writer submits it to different AI in order that the opposite AI can present AI blurbs for it? Books by AI, for AI, marketed to AI by AI? Simply this digital ouroborous consuming its personal tail, shitting in its personal mouth? What a wonderful future! Who wants folks in any respect?

Viewers Engagement and Neighborhood Administration: Publishers and creators could use AI to handle newsletters, reader outreach, group moderation, and buyer assist throughout social and digital platforms. These instruments form viewers relationships with out affecting the inventive work itself.

Pay attention I’m beginning to get drained. I largely simply wish to smear the phrase NO throughout the weblog in some form of bodily fluid, however I persevere —

God, simply write your personal newsletters, simply attain out to readers like an individual, average your group as you see match, be an individual coping with folks and if that’s an excessive amount of, don’t do it. Okay? Okay.

Workflow Automation and Inside Operations: AI is more and more used to automate scheduling, process administration, inside documentation, manufacturing monitoring, and coordination throughout editorial, design, and advertising groups. These operational makes use of assist the publishing course of with out influencing inventive authorship.

If that is non-LLM non-gen-AI shit, er, okay, but in addition, these things kinda occurs organically as it’s? This workflow is well-known and well-wrought. Each guide isn’t a unicorn — there’s a course of and individuals are the stations alongside the chain.

Authorized, Contractual, and Monetary Processes: Brokers and publishers more and more use AI instruments to overview contracts, analyze royalty statements, or flag authorized points. These enterprise makes use of are unrelated to the act of writing and shouldn’t have an effect on award eligibility. Nonetheless, it’s value noting that authors also can drop their contracts right into a generative AI system to ask it questions in regards to the contract associated to their unique work to make sure they perceive their rights, what they may be lacking, and what they need to discover extra totally with authorized counsel.

Ha ha, what, holy fuck, don’t let AI cope with authorized, contractual, or monetary shit. Jesus Fucking Christ, that is deeply irresponsible. It’s not good at it. Legal professionals present as much as court docket with this AI shit and so they get their asses handed to them. This isn’t an okay place for AI. It is a harmful place for AI.

If something disqualifies the “open letter,” it’s this.

Simply have an agent or a lawyer.

One which gained’t use AI.

Rights Administration and IP Safety: AI instruments are getting used to trace copyright infringement, detect unauthorized distribution, handle licensing, and monitor spinoff makes use of of inventive works on-line. These programs assist defend authors’ rights and revenue with out contributing to inventive content material.

This sounds effective, till you notice that…

AI simply makes stuff up.

On a regular basis.

Not simply my quantum cats, both. I’ve a search arrange for my identify and another subjects in Google and on daily basis it yields outcomes which are patently simply not there — a headline and a subhead will provide textual content and outline that merely aren’t current after I click on by means of. Your entire subject material isn’t even proper. It’s wholly fabricated. It will get worse! So. There was a child who died in my space, just lately? (Properly, he was in his 20s, I believe. I say child as a result of I’m more and more AN OLD.) And the online was stuffed with auto-generated AI barf about it — simply faux bizarre information a few poor lifeless child who died.

AI is a plagiaristic lie machine. You actually can’t depend on it to search out licensing information, spinoff works, and so forth.

Accessibility, Localization, and Format Adaptation: Publishers and platforms more and more use AI to generate captions, transcripts, audiobooks, large-print codecs, and translations for international or disabled audiences. These instruments develop entry to inventive works with out altering authorship or inventive intent but nonetheless contain generative AI touching the work after creation.

One other profoundly disqualifying bit. No! No. NO. Don’t let AI translate or transcribe our books.

HUMANS ONLY.

I imply, what the fuck. This letter appears to strive to lean towards “AI may help you in methods the place it doesn’t do the inventive work,” however audio books? Translations? It’s very a lot a part of that work. And we wish that carried out proper, and by folks.

(Partially due to accountability! You already know who’s accountable when an individual fails? That individual! You already know who’s accountable when AI fails? Ennnh! No one! Defrayed duty! Oops the poor widdle small man machine made a boo-boo. Need one thing carried out proper? Individuals are nice! We love folks! Individuals are why we do that factor! Cease kicking them out of the method!)

Manufacturing and Technical Preparation: AI is more and more utilized in formatting, structure checks, high quality assurance, audio cleanup, and technical preparation for print, e-book, and audio releases. These makes use of assist distribution quite than authorship.

One thing like audio cleanup can be, I think about, not about gen-AI/LLM. However different stuff, yeah, no, individuals are good. Let the folks do it. Thanks.

Generative and Agentic Web Platforms: The web itself is shifting from a search-based surroundings to a generative and agent-driven one. As generative engines like google, AI brokers, and platform-level AI fashions turn into embedded throughout the web, customers are working inside ecosystems the place AI mediates discovery, visibility, and engagement by default. Which means that data gathered in these environments more and more comes by means of generative AI programs.

AI

MADE

UP

CATS

I

DO

NOT

OWN

It instructed me I’ve most cancers!

That I’m a Christian and likewise Jewish!

It makes up stuff on a regular basis and we’re supposed to simply… give the whole lot over to those agentic dipshits? The wonderful factor was, we had this very good Web — messy, positive, however made of individuals and all of the stuff they mentioned and that they made and that got here out of their heads, after which we let robots scoop all of it up and begin remaking “new” variations endlessly and it’s been downhill since. Let’s not speed up our descent, yeah? That is foolish and unhealthy and I hate it. And you’ll inform I’m tapering off right here as a result of my logic is, admittedly, “ew I hate it,” however critically, it sucks and you understand it sucks and down deep in that area between your coronary heart and your abdomen it makes you’re feeling icky as shit, such as you ate some unhealthy shrimp. AI is unhealthy shrimp. Cease attempting to persuade us to eat extra of the unhealthy shrimp.

Disproportionate Affect on Small and Impartial Presses: Small and indie publishers typically depend on generative AI for advertising, planning, and evaluation as a result of they lack the staffing and budgets of enormous publishers. Blanket AI restrictions power these presses into an unattainable alternative of both avoiding trendy instruments that enable them to publish extra work and promote extra books or use them and disqualify all their authors from awards.

Small and indie presses present the essential worth of being small and indie, and indie by the way in which is indicative of human-influence — proper? You go to a small press, you need hands-on, you need folks you understand, a small versatile group, and never an enormous company. Properly, unhealthy information: AI is massive corpo shit. It’s techlord billionaire shit. If a small press can’t exist with out that, then perhaps they need to rethink whether or not or not they need to exist in any respect.

Operational Pressure on Fan Organizations and Conventions: Fan organizations and conventions are overwhelmingly volunteer-run and chronically understaffed. These teams function on extraordinarily restricted time and sources, typically counting on a small variety of overextended volunteers to deal with writing, enhancing, scheduling, advertising, and e-mail communications as a part of fundamental enterprise operations. AI instruments can cut back the burden of those time-consuming duties and assist volunteers work extra effectively. With out such assist, many conventions could also be compelled to cut back or shut down solely resulting from burnout and lack of operational capability. The lack of these group areas can be a big blow to the science fiction, fantasy, and horror group as a complete.

Uhh I believe I’d quite go to a conference run by folks, not deranged robots.

You need Fyre Fest? That is the way you get Fyre Fest. You desire a YA conference with a creepy ball pit? Yeah, that is that? Let AI do that and also you’ll find yourself with 1000 empty tables and no bogs.

Once more, the theme persists of: “I’m fairly positive conventions existed earlier than AI, and have been run fairly properly, so what’s the AI doing once more?”

Anyway, I’ve gotta faucet out right here.

There’s extra to the letter however finally it appears to depend on the false premise that creatives higher not SNOOZE, lest they LOSE, and we both become involved within the dialog and management AI or it runs over us. Besides it already ran over us and now we’re determining how you can get again up and string caltrops throughout the street to blow the fucking tires on this factor earlier than it tries to hit us once more. Additionally, no one’s inviting us to the desk. No one’s asking for our enter. All this does is obey upfront to a fascistic system — AI isn’t attempting to make good with writers, we’re not being requested to hitch the group. We’re simply being instructed to get on board or get fucked.

And I don’t agree with that framing.

I do know. I’m bullish on this. Belligerent. However I actually do hate it. I hate AI, and I hate all of the framing that it’s one way or the other important — it’s like being instructed you need to use a garlic press within the kitchen, and it’s inevitable, so use it, use it for the whole lot, use it for reducing bananas and chopping nuts and peeling potatoes and cleansing your oven and educating your youngsters and it could do all these issues so properly (spoiler: no it can’t) however SHUT UP AND USE THE GARLIC PRESS BECAUSE WE INVESTED A TRILLIONTY DOLLARS IN IT and if we are able to’t persuade you to subscribe to the garlic press for actually the whole lot on a regular basis — did we not point out it’s a subscription service? — then we’re fucked, uhh, I imply, you’re fucked for not utilizing our miracle product.

Anyway.

I believe AI is just inevitable once we imagine the lie of its inevitability.

I believe folks truly hate it. I believe they naturally resist it as a result of we are able to odor the existential risk coming off it just like the stench of the aforementioned unhealthy shrimp.

I believe we intuitively can detect the way it was made by wealthy fucks who wish to be richer fucks, and the way we’re simply chum within the bucket for his or her digital sharks.

And I believe it sucks.

It fucks the planet. It fucks our data constancy. It steals our shit, our sources, our time. It’s largely only a ruse, a risk, a lever: they will say oh take a pay reduce or we’re going to make use of the godlike AI to switch you, after which they change you anyway, and invite you again at an excellent sharper reduce so you’ll be able to herd the AI slop barf into form such as you’re Richard Dreyfuss with the fucking mashed potatoes in Shut Encounters.

As Ash from Military of Darkness says:

“It’s a trick. Get an axe.”

I’m drained and I emerged from HIBERNATION WEEK to jot down this and now I want a nap or perhaps I simply have to lick a pair batteries or one thing.

Anyway. That’s my open letter. Be at liberty to reply under, however in case you’re a chode, I drop you into the spam oubliette.

Destroy AI.

Purchase my books — a human wrote them.

Okay bye.